I know the groups are different, my observation was that Cloudflare supports these groups by providing them with services and in return they themselves become a target of such groups. My terrorist comment wasn't comparing them to terrorists, I guess a better point would have been "no honor among thieves". Cloudflare support these sort of groups and in return they are targeted.
Actually i think your right, your "observation" wasn't very appropriate.
Because your saying that you "observe" that a company who supported a certain group of hackers, got hacked back by someone we don't even know (maybe UGNazi, but who knows for sure). And then you look at it as if it was "funny" saying something like "see, no honor between thieves".
But... there's no point. Yeah because they got hacked like any other company could have been to get access to some of their clients data. And it's not like if what they did for LulzSec was to protect themselves of those sort of attacks. It's totally unrealistic to think that just by "helping" a group of hacker they would be totally immune against attacks from other groups. Imagine if Google also had helped a pair of hackers guys, would you except that the others hackers, decide, for honor, to not attack Gmail anymore ?
I find it a bit strange to lump a hosting provider together with terrorists accomplices.
News report about CloudFare and Lulzsec: http://www.it-networks.org/2012/03/01/how-cloudflare-kept-lu...