>knowing that my codebase has half a dozen classes that expose a .hide member. I hesitate even to ctrl+click on it in this editor, because I know it'll either do nothing or take me to the wrong definition.
to mean you were relying on your IDE to tell you which .hide() method you were calling.
As others have pointed out elsewhere, I think giving that functionality to ST2 would push it too far into the realm of IDE.
>knowing that my codebase has half a dozen classes that expose a .hide member. I hesitate even to ctrl+click on it in this editor, because I know it'll either do nothing or take me to the wrong definition.
to mean you were relying on your IDE to tell you which .hide() method you were calling.
As others have pointed out elsewhere, I think giving that functionality to ST2 would push it too far into the realm of IDE.