Exchanges and ban on pre-existing conditions don't kick in until 2014. That's why I left them out. But I agree, I should have been more precise.
Allowing 26-yr old "children" to stay on parents' healthcare only makes sense if the children are poor. Hence I counted it as geared towards poor. But I can see your point of view too.
Allowing 26-yr old "children" to stay on parents' healthcare only makes sense if the children are poor. Hence I counted it as geared towards poor. But I can see your point of view too.