Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | prime_ursid's commentslogin

If the climate effects don’t get you, the political fallout of a million climate refugees showing up at your borders will.


Wouldn’t that be against TOS?


It might be through a level of indirection via an intermediate provider, offloading the TOS issue to the intermediate provider who couldn't care less.


Source: it was revealed to me in a dream


The trajectory is that the LLM providers have been making prompting increasingly dead-simple for the past 2 years. Any edge a group of individuals may have in knowing how to use LLMs gets absorbed into the LLM product.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_and_Bill's_law

> What Andy giveth, Bill taketh away


Andy and Bill's law is caused by Andy and Bill's law?


Nah, I disagree. I can see why you think this is another piece glorifying engineers at the expense of the business. However, as a technical founder in a former life, I saw a handful of mistakes that the engineers made. Lack of focus, lack of pushback, poor management of the engineering team, lack of product thinking, lack of connection to and empathy for the end user. I could find more if I re-read it.

I found this piece to contain more layers of detail than the usual feel-good dunk-on-bean-counters rants.


This is a technique called LLM-as-Judge. Well-studied at this point. Here’s a good intro: https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-as-a-judge

I recommend reading Hamel.dev posts. Here’s an example: https://hamel.dev/blog/posts/evals/


Awesome, thank you! I am starting to do some work building LLM workflows and would like to stand on some giant's shoulders to skip the initial flailing :)


> If you ever listen to music and sing along, even for a few seconds, the volume cuts

Yup, and I also have this problem when I laugh out loud listening to comedy podcasts.


> We have tolerated low quality art for far too long because we pretend mechanical dexterity is what makes art, art.

Who is “we” in this sentence? A tiny subsection of metalheads? The vast majority of people aren’t seeking out the most mechanically dexterous musicians to listen to.


I felt the same way and came to the comments to see if anyone else smelled it. It's either AI-assisted writing or people are genuinely starting to write like how ChatGPT sounds.

First, the structure of this satirical post is headings and bullet points. Fine, whatever, a lot of people write this way.

Then there's the exhausting litany of super short sentence fragments.

> He published this. Openly. In a book. As a priest.

This is how airport novels and LinkedIn "thought leadership" clickbait is written, so ok, fine, I'll let it pass.

Then I started to notice a lot of: "It's not X. It's Y" or "this isn't just A. It's B."

> Feeding isn’t nutrition. It’s dialysis.

Before LLMs, people weren't writing this way. At the risk of sounding like a curmudgeon: it's insulting to read, like the reader is a 5-year-old.

When several of these smells pile up, I close the tab immediately and try to forget about it. This one was so egregious that I had to read the whole thing and then come to the comments to rant a bit.


> it's insulting to read, like the reader is a 5-year-old.

It's not ELI5. It's ELY5.


The author has a bunch of AI stuff in their bio, so I assume this is partially or fully generated unless otherwise disclaimed.

But hey, maybe someone can get an AI to read it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: